From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,dfe340a115a0bc1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-04 11:01:28 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!a6202946!not-for-mail From: Jeffrey Carter Organization: jrcarter commercial-at acm [period | full stop] org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Naming convention for classes? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 19:01:28 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.184.17.41 X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net X-Trace: newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net 1075921288 63.184.17.41 (Wed, 04 Feb 2004 11:01:28 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 11:01:28 PST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5242 Date: 2004-02-04T19:01:28+00:00 List-Id: Peter C. Chapin wrote: > > Okay, so in other words either approach is considered acceptable by the > community at large. It's a matter of style. At least that's the > impression I get from your reply. Does that sound like a fair > assessment? To a large degree, yes, but as other replies have shown, there are cases where the use-unfriendly approach does not work. -- Jeff Carter "Perfidious English mouse-dropping hoarders." Monty Python & the Holy Grail 10