From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,508516c114ade8e1
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.231.202 with SMTP id ti10mr1862024pbc.5.1328808691441;
        Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:31:31 -0800 (PST)
X-FeedAbuse: http://nntpfeed.proxad.net/abuse.pl feeded by 88.191.131.2
Path: 
 wr5ni5639pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!nntpfeed.proxad.net!88.191.131.2.MISMATCH!news.chainon-marquant.org!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ada without ada libraries?
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 18:31:26 +0100
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <chawu4hzb7nz.7wcwgamywo64.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <eecf117d-e86f-45d0-b6ed-50931273e858@h6g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
 <82mx8tttx7.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <kx86q1tkvfcd$.fmbdm6c01k6i.dlg@40tude.net>
 <ba3906c0-e832-455e-b236-3dd1ad65c79b@4g2000pbz.googlegroups.com>
 <120f2efrm73fc$.mi1m9kwbbkes$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <op.v9eoh6szule2fv@douda-yannick> <1o71uiwmoiunb.bkjz8c54rcbl.dlg@40tude.net>
 <cb760726-7845-4b2f-97f4-9165504b44b9@b18g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>
 <4F33F89E.3070207@obry.net> <op.v9e8bttbule2fv@douda-yannick>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: trR2WuoGABtEWk7YPfvgdQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2012-02-09T18:31:26+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:03:19 +0100, Yannick Duch�ne (Hibou57) wrote:

> Just think about a calculator which could accept complex formula and  
> repeat the calculation with different variable assignations (a simple and  
> easy example).

How the *language* of that calculator is different from Ada? E.g.

  2+4  -- Is it not Ada? Better than Ada?

To make your point, you should compare the UI of, say, Windows calculator
and prove that "press button 2", "press button +", "press button 4", "press
button =" is a better language than "2+4" for *complex* formulae! Go on!
(:-))

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de