From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,82019ed25537e72d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!news.cs.univ-paris8.fr!informatik.uni-bremen.de!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: static GtkAda Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:55:59 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: <87isb7nluv.fsf@insalien.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1093460159 15907 134.91.1.34 (25 Aug 2004 18:55:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:55:59 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2995 Date: 2004-08-25T18:55:59+00:00 List-Id: Ludovic Brenta wrote: : project My_Static_Project is : ... : package Linker is : for Default_Options ("Ada") use : ("/usr/lib/libgtkada2.a", : "/usr/lib/libgnomeada2.a", -- if required I was wondering whether libgtkada2-dev could be made independent of libgnome2-dev, as this dependence creates a host of 2nd level GNOME dependence for all Debian GtkAda applications? -- Georg