From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b5cd7bf26d091c6f X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Reading the while standard input into a String Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:31:21 +0200 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: References: <1ckesozpipi2y$.p1ei3zmgxjfc$.dlg@40tude.net> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: 6an/HxOXjVOykPvLkSpw3Q.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:20618 Date: 2011-06-06T20:31:21+02:00 List-Id: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:55:39 -0700, Jeffrey Carter wrote: > Unbounded_String is perfectly reasonable for many situations; worrying about > "efficiency" before encountering timing constraints is premature optimization. Only if Unbounded_String had array interface. Without that Unbounded_String introduces additional complexity to the design. I see no reason to use Unbounded_String for an input buffer, texts which never change etc. There exist cases for Unbounded_String, but not that many. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de