From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 11232c,877ba3d67e73c6c3 X-Google-Attributes: gid11232c,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac39a12d5faf5b14 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-17 16:14:37 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.mailgate.org!mygate.mailgate.org!198.207.153.205!not-for-mail From: "Kent Paul Dolan" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,misc.misc Subject: Re: Rant! (was) Development process in the Ada community Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 23:14:37 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG Message-ID: References: <3CB46975.90408@snafu.de> <3CB77A6B.5090504@snafu.de> <184076622a7c648f157c56e417bd86d4.48257@mygate.mailgate.org> <3CB9375F.8040904@snafu.de> <3CB9AF3C.8030301@snafu.de> <3CBC5281.1040202@snafu.de> <3CBDAAA9.5050302@snafu.de> <555f76f7dd67c7f1678e027353d1a6a1.48257@mygate.mailgate.org> <3CBDE85F.9ACFD30@san.rr.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.207.153.205 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.mailgate.org 1019077366 32607 198.207.153.205 (Thu Apr 18 01:14:37 2002) X-Complaints-To: abuse@mailgate.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 23:14:37 +0000 (UTC) Injector-Info: news.mailgate.org; posting-host=198.207.153.205; posting-account=48257; posting-date=1019077366 User-Agent: Mailgate Web Server X-URL: http://mygate.mailgate.org/mynews/comp/comp.lang.ada/cfd7474f6f855245ebbe8bd237d21ee1.48257%40mygate.mailgate.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22684 misc.misc:6510 Date: 2002-04-17T23:14:37+00:00 List-Id: "Darren New" wrote:. > How about a binding to Tk (of Tcl fame)? I thought GNAT already supports > that, yes? Reasonable, I presume you mean GtkAda, which I haven't seen (amazing how much of the universe of discourse you can't explore when your pillow is the pavement). Since there is already a Perl binding to Tk (which (PerlTk) I have used), the more languages that add in a Tk binding, the better chance you have of making it the de facto standard; I'm not enough of a theorist to compare it to either the Java GUI or to the various international standard graphics APIs for superiority, though. xanthian. -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG