From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ddb34e4ee5e28db0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-29 00:58:19 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: rod.chapman@praxis-cs.co.uk (Rod Chapman) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: XRP Date: 29 Apr 2004 00:58:18 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <20040425224751.C907A4C4136@lovelace.ada-france.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.173.119.178 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1083225499 28484 127.0.0.1 (29 Apr 2004 07:58:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 07:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7557 Date: 2004-04-29T00:58:18-07:00 List-Id: Lutz Donnerhacke wrote in message news:... > * Alexei Polkhanov wrote: > > We should really change subject from BIND to XRP then. Leave the BIND alone > > and think about implementation of XRP server which has little to do with > > BIND. > > Fine. I'm feeling comfortable with this project. If you're really serious about a high-integrity implementation, then why not do it in SPARK? We'd might be able to support such an effort (in terms of tools and support, if not actual engineering effort... :-) ) The SPARK toolset is, of course, totally free to University faculty... - Rod, SPARK Team