From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9e3222ec528646b1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-30 10:01:01 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: rod.chapman@praxis-cs.co.uk (Rod Chapman) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Enforcing good software process Date: 30 Apr 2003 10:01:00 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.168.98.51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1051722061 13643 127.0.0.1 (30 Apr 2003 17:01:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Apr 2003 17:01:01 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36770 Date: 2003-04-30T17:01:01+00:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake wrote in message news: > I never said anything about "guarranteed correct". I was talking about > reliability, and about liability. Ford and GM are liable when their > cars break; it would be nice if there were more software companies > that took the same attitude. We have delivered software with warranties, and we will continue to do so. Examples are CDIS (part of the London air-traffic management systems), SHOLIS, and the MULTOS CA. In the case of the latter project, four defects were reported in the first year of operation - these were corrected under our warranty at no cost to our client. - Rod, Praxis Critical Systems