From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS,PLING_QUERY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.107.162.70 with SMTP id l67mr856085ioe.138.1523685654821;
        Fri, 13 Apr 2018 23:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4794:: with SMTP id
 b20-v6mr118980otf.12.1523685654563;
 Fri, 13 Apr 2018 23:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.unit0.net!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!k65-v6no919393ita.0!news-out.google.com!u64-v6ni1824itb.0!nntp.google.com!e130-v6no904755itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 23:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <pargbn$kgj$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=85.240.215.178;
 posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.240.215.178
References: <115d2e72-2b30-4ec0-b42f-52e9df2905d4@googlegroups.com>
 <f6b52822-3cdb-4dec-b5ea-0a3e49f845e2@googlegroups.com>
 <aeb87b8c-a777-4417-ba9a-af9beeda281f@googlegroups.com>
 <e0a89dde-ed5f-4814-b7f9-73ecd0c6d466@googlegroups.com>
 <c5ca4f5c-65db-4e6c-bfc1-15dc903a380b@googlegroups.com>
 <pargbn$kgj$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <cf242cb6-90c6-4d3e-af08-578b5913d2b7@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: no, it can't be,
 there's no "with procedure instance_of_generic_procedure
 is new generic_procedure;" ? Impossible !
From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 06:00:54 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2246
X-Received-Body-CRC: 595782281
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51494
Date: 2018-04-13T23:00:54-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

That's one of the first AI I read with delight from beginning to end, I for=
got. and I see no one complained about "or use" (not "use" alone) in partic=
ular. There might still hope.
Damn wikibook, one way to let people make fool of themselves :-D . Unintent=
ionally of course. The last AI about default is http://www.ada-auth.org/cgi=
-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ai12s/ai12-0205-1.txt, so that people won't search it. I go=
t all pumped up and all, but at least it shows even beginner can understand=
 what the most intuitive change might be ? I'll pray for "or use", it would=
 be a shame (or even a scam ...) if it's not approved.

I wonder, _how_the_heck_ it might have been deemed "not important enough" t=
o settle on something ??