From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,146e39fd3921c79f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!eusc.inter.net!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: binary size (gnat+win console) Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:04:10 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1091451850 14239 134.91.1.34 (2 Aug 2004 13:04:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:04:10 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2500 Date: 2004-08-02T13:04:10+00:00 List-Id: Per Sandberg wrote: : * Having the same set of runtime checks enabled (Suppress all : checks when copmparing Ada and C/C++). WRT C++ this isn't entirely fair, I think. There are checked operations in some frequently used containers. The decision whether checking is used or not is expressed at the source level, by choosing the operator/function used to gain access to components. Not by a choice of compiler switches. -- Georg