From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,75d2eb9e2e52a8c5 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!z15g2000prn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Rod Kay Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Problem where a function is invoked once but called twice (when invocation is within an allocator). Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 15:35:42 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <87r58dxeia.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <17caa8eb-8113-4199-83b7-9b199887a758@k15g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <68228b55-070c-4678-b584-8278988e73fc@k3g2000prl.googlegroups.com> <85890ff0-343f-4d79-aba0-c3d214b4a28e@t19g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <6f9bcec9-219d-4163-96f0-ddc4599f4274@d26g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <7333adc4-3b87-48cb-902a-bff11d062b6a@v8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 110.174.207.98 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1305239743 14014 127.0.0.1 (12 May 2011 22:35:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 22:35:43 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: z15g2000prn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=110.174.207.98; posting-account=Uqu8JwoAAADsGt83KB06QWEVsML1fPO7 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/10.04 Chromium/11.0.696.65 Chrome/11.0.696.65 Safari/534.24,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19242 Date: 2011-05-12T15:35:42-07:00 List-Id: On May 10, 10:55=A0am, Anh Vo wrote: > > Have you sent a bug report yet? I hope you did if you want to see it > fix in GNAT-GPL-2011. One has been sent now (thank you Jesse Lang). And thanks to all who've replied and to Dan for taking the time to simplify the test case.