From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,442a61fa28886220 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-19 16:57:47 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: igouy@yahoo.com (Isaac Gouy) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada for a programming newb. Date: 19 Sep 2003 16:57:46 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.65.108.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1064015867 11156 127.0.0.1 (19 Sep 2003 23:57:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Sep 2003 23:57:47 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:42703 Date: 2003-09-19T23:57:47+00:00 List-Id: "Chad R. Meiners" wrote > > Let me suggest Oberon-2. It's a small precise language - you'll be > > able to learn the keywords and operators quickly and the compiler will > > tell you exactly where you made a mistake in the program. You'll find > > it readable. You'll be able to learn about procedural programming and > > object-oriented programming. > > How is this any different than starting with a subset of Ada? One of Ada's > excellent features is that you can program in the subset of the language > that you feel comfortable with. Students can branch out onto new features > in a comfortable and consistent manner. With well-designed teaching materials to demarcate a subset of Ada it would be very similar. Without that help...