From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.66.186.4 with SMTP id fg4mr8396485pac.33.1378139875948;
 Mon, 02 Sep 2013 09:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.49.83.199 with SMTP id s7mr865qey.11.1378139875532; Mon, 02
 Sep 2013 09:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pt2no47357456pbb.0!news-out.google.com!rn2ni53263pbc.1!nntp.google.com!pt2no47357454pbb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 09:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <52244ec0$0$6573$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=84.211.163.123;
 posting-account=uulyKwoAAAA86DO0ODu--rZtbje8Sytn
NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.211.163.123
References: 
 <19595886.4450.1332248078686.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbfy7>
 <2012032020582259520-rblove@airmailnet> <jkc59a$hs5$2@speranza.aioe.org>
 <12ee9bc5-3bdf-4ac0-b805-5f10b3859ff4@googlegroups.com>
 <vhcvr8d4kq6ribdqeeb0b857ei5aa5luiv@4ax.com>
 <6c58fae4-6c34-4d7a-ab71-e857e55897c0@x6g2000vbj.googlegroups.com>
 <wccvc5b49yc.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <op.w2g9br0kule2fv@cardamome>
 <wccli3kzfbx.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <kvofa4$dnc$1@adenine.netfront.net>
 <8c3b331d-4da7-46ec-ab8e-2496c294cde4@googlegroups.com>
 <52244ec0$0$6573$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ce3581ca-8ae9-4541-8b56-185dbe647322@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Ada advocacy
From: Egil H H <ehh.public@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 16:37:55 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Original-Bytes: 2133
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:183259
Date: 2013-09-02T09:37:54-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Monday, September 2, 2013 10:41:02 AM UTC+2, G.B. wrote:
> 
> Assuming that P1 and P2 are POs (or passive tasks), there is
> 
> just one program counter applying to both. Won't this
> 
> prevent P1 and P2 from running at the same time?

An asynchronous select statement may be executed concurrently,
or even in parallel on a multi-processor platform.
(and it is with Gnat on Linux)