From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,f857f366542cd8aa
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!r36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Dispatch on the result still does not work?
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <ce03af53-3750-45ac-bec2-b38bade25094@r36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
References: <ubjkmle9n5pi.1ovhyam5f9lf5$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <3a2a94a3-91df-411e-b078-498cc7850554@18g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
	<dyupu10xh14z.g4shiz3dk995.dlg@40tude.net>
 <f4df2dac-81b6-4015-82a6-92926897071c@y17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
	<7tu7wng4vxn6.nhbegffx941o$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <e270a59d-a1b5-4be8-a97a-10b5b477e2b4@d32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
	<ss4x5bik8ye5.1mdrd2w9b82gk$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.66.190.65
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1247354521 17491 127.0.0.1 (11 Jul 2009 23:22:01
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:22:01 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: r36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.66.190.65;
	posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
	fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7006
Date: 2009-07-11T16:22:01-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 11 juil, 21:29, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de>
wrote:
> I would not. A limited object (actually any object) is to be constructed,
> by a constructor, which cannot be a function or procedure. (The current
> solution is like a conceptual Swiss cheese)

Your mean another syntatic construct would be welcome to make things
more distinct ?