From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.107.6.16 with SMTP id 16mr23533056iog.105.1511779393621; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 02:43:13 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.157.42.99 with SMTP id t90mr1658371ota.5.1511779393522; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 02:43:13 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.unit0.net!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!i6no7311305itb.0!news-out.google.com!x87ni5234ita.0!nntp.google.com!i6no7311302itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 02:43:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87shd0xdg9.fsf@jacob-sparre.dk> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.167.214.186; posting-account=bPTmZAoAAAC_6HP9XLKB9aAAxBa6BuOR NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.167.214.186 References: <7c246c12-77f6-45c9-a05a-9afe934df332@googlegroups.com> <87wp2cxfif.fsf@jacob-sparre.dk> <9e2e130c-72e6-4a77-9bab-dacc22f22a25@googlegroups.com> <87shd0xdg9.fsf@jacob-sparre.dk> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Strange warning message From: reinert Injection-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:43:13 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Received-Body-CRC: 813854460 X-Received-Bytes: 2004 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49183 Date: 2017-11-27T02:43:13-08:00 List-Id: On Monday, November 27, 2017 at 10:45:12 AM UTC+1, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote: > Reinert writes: > > > OK, but still I am confused. The loop (in the program): > > > > for e of test1 loop > > e := new test1_t; > > end loop; > > > > does the same as "test1(1) := new test1_t;"? > > Yes. Both of them only write to "test1". GNAT usually means "reads > values from", when it writes "references". But then I would expect the same warning (for the loop and "test1(1) := new test1_t;" ? reinert > > Greetings, > > Jacob > -- > xsnow | xshovel > /dev/null