From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.224.215.68 with SMTP id hd4mr17591567qab.5.1371899815526;
        Sat, 22 Jun 2013 04:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.49.62.3 with SMTP id u3mr374606qer.26.1371899815372; Sat, 22
 Jun 2013 04:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.bbs-scene.org!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!j2no40561qak.0!news-out.google.com!y6ni4002qax.0!nntp.google.com!j2no1198114qak.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 04:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <d72hcigo9i82$.p743e93bey4f.dlg@40tude.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=92.235.245.78;
 posting-account=g4n69woAAACHKbpceNrvOhHWViIbdQ9G
NNTP-Posting-Host: 92.235.245.78
References: <69246de0-4b33-4d47-b5be-a45e8c911fb0@googlegroups.com>
 <q6iis4gksf17$.1nwzusylsw864$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <28f43920-c490-4da0-80b3-6405dec09879@googlegroups.com>
 <d72hcigo9i82$.p743e93bey4f.dlg@40tude.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <cce23983-07e7-4886-9b8d-00ff6726c53a@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Ada202X: Easy to use "UML private"-like components
From: Martin <martin@thedowies.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 11:16:55 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:15890
Date: 2013-06-22T04:16:55-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, June 21, 2013 3:51:32 PM UTC+1, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 02:33:11 -0700 (PDT), Martin wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > But no easy means of keeping member data private from children.
> 
> 
> 
> On the contrary, don't make them children.


But then I loose visibility of the classes protected operations...

-- Martin