From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.107.18.161 with SMTP id 33mr22432574ios.8.1514398128882; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 10:08:48 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.157.92.195 with SMTP id r3mr1209005oti.8.1514398128675; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 10:08:48 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.unit0.net!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!g80no3053093itg.0!news-out.google.com!b73ni11672ita.0!nntp.google.com!g80no3053092itg.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 10:08:48 -0800 (PST) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.240.218.207; posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.240.218.207 User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: unicode and wide_text_io From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 18:08:48 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Received-Body-CRC: 1821411341 X-Received-Bytes: 1758 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49659 Date: 2017-12-27T10:08:48-08:00 List-Id: I would like to avoid rewriting an I-O related package, which would prove t= iresome to the end. As it is, it uses UTF8 (so TEXT_IO), but for ONE, only = ONE character, I need to "put" WIDE_TEXT_IO. The slash character =E2=81=84 = would allow better looking fractions for outputting rationnals, since it's = meant to tell the terminal to consider numbers before and after as superscr= ipt and subscript, respectively. Is there a way in unicode in UTF8 to shift outside of UTF8 ? I doubt so, and saying it like this sounds autocontradictory, but that woul= d be fun, so ... ? Or else, I write a "put" only for screen ?