From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7a3b1c6915ea1273
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.211.195 with SMTP id ne3mr209183pbc.2.1326444575828;
        Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:49:35 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 lh20ni176817pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!n6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How many Ada compiler bugs are here?
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:47:35 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <cb4706b1-0635-407f-9ed0-1e1d552ee279@n6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>
References: <01dd6341-9c3c-4dcb-90f8-6ac66c65eb66@z1g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>
 <jentdh$4sd$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <98adc34c-deed-4190-9e10-755cb886984f@n39g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
 <r5zh8ht12meh$.wxldkm3c7893.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.7.110.17
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1326444575 26984 127.0.0.1 (13 Jan 2012 08:49:35
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 08:49:35 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: n6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com; posting-host=91.7.110.17;
 posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: HUALESNKRC
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0;
 rv:8.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0.1,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2012-01-13T00:47:35-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 13 Jan., 09:23, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de>
wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:26:34 -0800 (PST), Adam Beneschan wrote:
> > But then again, with extended returns, you don't need to cook up a
> > value. =A0The code:
>
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-- =A0needed to please the compiler:
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0return (Ada.Finalization.Limited_Controlled
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0with others =3D> <>);
>
> > could be written more simply as
>
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0return Dummy : T;
>
> Not when T requires initialization, i.e. publicly has boxed discriminants=
.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Dmitry A. Kazakovhttp://www.dmitry-kazakov.de

Of course this is legal since it's in the scope of the full view (it's
a definite type in the full view, an indefinite only in the partial
view).