From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,3025dd6d917b499c X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.224.70.131 with SMTP id d3mr2570501qaj.0.1350046687285; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 05:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.29.174 with SMTP id l14mr735723vdh.13.1350046687238; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 05:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Path: r17ni22254524qap.0!nntp.google.com!l8no46418405qao.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 05:58:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=90.194.162.39; posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.194.162.39 References: <38af7fb8-b0a4-4a31-87aa-b7b698cc89c3@googlegroups.com> <3ca0ffd0-1764-484b-8fab-17c0d2dd9463@googlegroups.com> <1f645050-cf4c-40bf-a797-9687b69e4a54@googlegroups.com> <18ats2960nsvm$.kfufsnul13aq$.dlg@40tude.net> <5072c9ae$0$6562$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <4keoa6epdxt7.1nnwxy7v7ar90.dlg@40tude.net> <5072dc68$0$6554$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <1f7cmfp1l65w1.1deog8cfxbs0u$.dlg@40tude.net> <5072e37a$0$6556$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <877gr0hcvz.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <891f0a08-da88-4cec-bcbc-3a987d3c05fd@googlegroups.com> <73bfe0bd-c80c-4279-94c8-d846f7e47c1d@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ada, the best language with the not-so-best tool chain From: Lucretia Injection-Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:58:07 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2012-10-12T05:58:07-07:00 List-Id: On Friday, 12 October 2012 13:45:20 UTC+1, Simon Clubley wrote: > Do you happen to know what bits have been removed from the FSF MIPS tree ? I know of one MIPS INSN macros that was removed, I notified the PIC32 GCC maintainer on Github about it, there could be a ton more. I don't know as this stuff isn't documented and the source *is not* documentation in this case. > Is it something which affects C code as well or just any future potential > > Ada port ? It's code gen, so all front-ends. > The PIC32MX MCUs are also on my list of things to look at in the future > and it would be nice to be able to use the mainline FSF gcc version instead > of the Microchip branch. It would be even nicer to be able to run Ada on Yup, and seeing as GCC can generate MIPS16e it should be possible. Luke.