From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.42.26.77 with SMTP id e13mr3391426icc.7.1403221631810;
        Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.114.161 with SMTP id jh1mr459igb.3.1403221631703; Thu, 19
 Jun 2014 16:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!news.glorb.com!hn18no1632937igb.0!news-out.google.com!gf2ni8igb.0!nntp.google.com!uq10no297475igb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <wccbntoob68.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=66.126.103.122;
 posting-account=KSa2aQoAAACOxnC0usBJYX8NE3x3a1Xq
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122
References: <1402308235.2520.153.camel@pascal.home.net>
 <85ioo9yukk.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <ln6tlg$1vc$1@dont-email.me>
 <255b51cd-b23f-4413-805a-9fea3c70d8b2@googlegroups.com>
 <ln6uv9$bk8$1@dont-email.me>
 <b22db9fb-a73d-438a-8cfd-f0bb1db70eed@googlegroups.com>
 <MPElv.491358$1w1.428312@fx03.iad>
 <5ebe316d-cd84-40fb-a983-9f953f205fef@googlegroups.com>
 <ln7ngt$c8a$1@dont-email.me>
 <2100734262424129975.133931laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
 <lnn5ko$ner$1@loke.gir.dk> <lnn8ff$k42$1@dont-email.me>
 <857442918424729589.090275laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
 <slrnlq2eom.i0l.lithiumcat@nat.rebma.instinctive.eu>
 <lnrpsq$8ao$1@dont-email.me>
 <slrnlq3jd8.i0l.lithiumcat@nat.rebma.instinctive.eu>
 <erb49jp6qy6n$.5cesca6do7x3$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <slrnlq54jv.i0l.lithiumcat@nat.rebma.instinctive.eu>
 <9j4b774g2gbz$.a22j8j4ai1l1$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <tYmdnRDwdcBVTz_ORVn_vwA@giganews.com> <wccbntoob68.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <cae425fb-0c73-4541-a380-79ddd7b299df@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Ada platforms and pricing, was: Re: a new language, designed for
 safety !
From: Adam Beneschan <adambeneschan@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:47:11 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:20460
Date: 2014-06-19T16:47:11-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, June 19, 2014 2:13:19 PM UTC-7, Robert A Duff wrote:

> Yes.  The syntax rules given in the RM are ambiguous.  For example, in a
> context expecting an expression, "X(Y)" could be a function_call,
> type_conversion, indexed_component, or slice.  (Did I forget any?)
> 
> Likewise, in statement context, that same text could be a procedure_call
> or an entry_call.

I'm not sure where entry families fit into the above, but that's another possibility.

                             -- Adam