From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6cc64201bac042c6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Just Passing By Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1086695594 5351 134.91.1.34 (8 Jun 2004 11:53:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:53:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1236 Date: 2004-06-08T11:53:14+00:00 List-Id: Andrew Carroll wrote: : Rational? It's currently written in C, need I say more? Yes, definitely. Just imagine the following situational parameters: - TCP/IP networking is currently associated with C in the heads of just about everyone you want to convince, right? - TCP/IP is running the internet, even MS has switched to TCP/IP. - There is nothing to show, no rationale, no specifics, no programs, on sourceforge. O.K., there are no grandiloquent plans either, which is good. - It is not easy to see the idea, it can't be that Ada is so much better? Or is it? How, specifically, does it improve existing implementations? What will the savings be? - Is it easier to write networking programs in Ada using AdaBIND instead of bindings to existing software? Can C programs use AdaBIND?