From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,cf677878aa77e0d8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-16 06:24:32 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!feed.textport.net!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Ted Dennison References: <3B4F2962.25BB60FF@boeing.com> <3B50D895.EB3C192@san.rr.com> Subject: Re: an infinate loop Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:24:24 EDT Organization: http://www.newsranger.com Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:24:24 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9991 Date: 2001-07-16T13:24:24+00:00 List-Id: In article <3B50D895.EB3C192@san.rr.com>, Darren New says... > >Ted Dennison wrote: >> >while not End_Of_File loop >function Still_More_File (...) : Boolean is . >Wouldn't that do it? (I always thought it was kind of odd to provide an >EOF function instead of a Theres_Still_Some_Left function.) Yeah, you could make a special function to do it. But "not" is probably just as clear as doing that. --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com