From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,54e6f3bfd18d2769
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: tmoran@bix.com
Subject: Re: Pointer function parameter
Date: 2000/10/19
Message-ID: <cJGH5.335638$i5.5078954@news1.frmt1.sfba.home.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 683485742
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010191126450.17222-100000@lexis.di.fct.unl.pt>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net
X-Trace: news1.frmt1.sfba.home.com 971978696 24.20.190.201 (Thu,
 19 Oct 2000 11:04:56 PDT)
Organization: @Home Network
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:04:56 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-10-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>virtually all dynamic data structures (linked lists, trees, etc.)
>require them.  [access types]
  No. People were making those structures using array indexing and not
access types a long, long time ago.  Look at some old Fortran code.