From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2afae4a128914036,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.cs.univ-paris8.fr!informatik.uni-bremen.de!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: wide_string and assertions Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 16:23:17 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1086279797 12879 134.91.1.34 (3 Jun 2004 16:23:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 16:23:17 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1075 Date: 2004-06-03T16:23:17+00:00 List-Id: AI-00286 present pragma assert with two arguments, one of them a string. (Likewise, exceptions can be raised "with a string"). I have some messages I want use as the second argument. They contain characters outside Latin-1. (And another 8bit character set won't do.) In an assert(x, y), y has to be static. So I guess for y I will have to play tricks and use UTF-8 coding of static String values? Has using Wide_String variants ever been considered? Or is there just "no demand"? -- Georg