From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.36.228.76 with SMTP id o73mr9313655ith.32.1513527874659; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 08:24:34 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.157.14.137 with SMTP id 9mr680470otj.14.1513527874047; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 08:24:34 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.kjsl.com!usenet.stanford.edu!i6no621701itb.0!news-out.google.com!b73ni2368ita.0!nntp.google.com!i6no621697itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 08:24:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <66aa262e-2ac9-4016-b32d-e9fee14779e1@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.245.162.244; posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.245.162.244 References: <1ac5a44b-4423-443a-a7bb-2864d9abe78f@googlegroups.com> <1498048151.20885.28.camel@obry.net> <96174ea5-852d-44e9-8535-7c1eb24d5326@googlegroups.com> <8d3aff06-82df-485f-89e5-a50c326aab05@googlegroups.com> <66aa262e-2ac9-4016-b32d-e9fee14779e1@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ada Annoyances From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 16:24:34 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49507 Date: 2017-12-17T08:24:33-08:00 List-Id: So, some of you think the stupidity is on the side of certain customers, to= ban tagged types as a whole, as objetively there is no added cost when we = don't use 'Class types ? Rather than on the language designers', for taggin= g controlled type and cursor etc by default ? Can someone answer simply, if there is or not, really no difference (save f= or some more bits for the tag) between regular records types and tagged typ= es, when not using class types ?