From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,627a173c3309b242
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
Path: 
 controlnews3.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!feed.news.tiscali.de!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!itgate.net!news-out.tin.it!news-in.tin.it!news.finmeccanica.it!not-for-mail
From: "Davide" <ppp@ppp.it>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Allocation of local constant arrays
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 17:17:45 +0200
Organization: Finmeccanica
Message-ID: <c8ftqq$i9c$1@e3k.asi.ansaldo.it>
References: <c8ft6t$gt9$1@e3k.asi.ansaldo.it>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.168.54.114
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Xref: controlnews3.google.com comp.lang.ada:696
Date: 2004-05-19T17:17:45+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Davide" <ppp@ppp.it> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:c8ft6t$gt9$1@e3k.asi.ansaldo.it...
> Suppose to
> perform, inside that procedure, a loop in which the elements of the
constant
> array are accessed sequentially until some condition become true.

just a clarification. I mentioned that loop because I think in that case the
compiler cannot insert, where referenced, the constant values of the array
directly into the generated machine code.