From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7f2ce8bda9cae4ab X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: controlnews3.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.cs.univ-paris8.fr!informatik.uni-bremen.de!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: "Must instantiate controlled types at library level." Why? Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 13:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1084972194 20722 134.91.1.34 (19 May 2004 13:09:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 13:09:54 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: controlnews3.google.com comp.lang.ada:684 Date: 2004-05-19T13:09:54+00:00 List-Id: Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: Hm. First you say, : Things like availability of class-wide : programming, MI, MD, interface inheritance, supertyping etc are : essential for, say, container library. Then, : This heavily influences the : whole design. It is C++'s insufficient ADT which led to STL. So I guess you have definitions of "container library" and ADT that are both novel in some respect? Would you mind telling us? : The major problem is weakness of Ada's ADT. Unfortunately people keep : on looking in wrong direction. Generics won't help. Then what will help an Abstract Datatype? How? -- Georg