From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a6b:ce10:: with SMTP id p16-v6mr64059iob.87.1526698919711; Fri, 18 May 2018 20:01:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4712:: with SMTP id a18-v6mr92872otf.1.1526698919548; Fri, 18 May 2018 20:01:59 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!85.12.16.70.MISMATCH!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!v8-v6no2222150itc.0!news-out.google.com!f20-v6ni2387itd.0!nntp.google.com!u74-v6no2189494itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 20:01:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <81d14d85-1c41-4558-93e5-6a6d9ecf091a@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=96.247.198.106; posting-account=QF6XPQoAAABce2NyPxxDAaKdAkN6RgAf NNTP-Posting-Host: 96.247.198.106 References: <81d14d85-1c41-4558-93e5-6a6d9ecf091a@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How is Ada's GNOGA better than C++'s Wt? From: Jere Injection-Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 03:01:59 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Received-Bytes: 1945 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1319789581 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52461 Date: 2018-05-18T20:01:59-07:00 List-Id: On Friday, May 18, 2018 at 3:01:49 PM UTC-4, Dan'l Miller wrote: > This brings up a related topic: What are all the ways that Ada's GNOGA at http://Gnoga.com is better than, say, C++'s Wt (pronounced Witty*) at http://WebToolkit.eu/wt? I'll start: I don't know others feelings on the topic, but one of the things I really like about Gnoga is that it is a concurrent GUI framework. Every event has its own thread, so you are free to block as needed when needed. I don't know Wt well enough to say 100% it isn't similar, but everything that I have read on it puts the GUI operations in a single thread. I know it isn't a huge thing, but sometimes the little things make a difference.