From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,20dd8ed49a092517 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.224.189.75 with SMTP id dd11mr1988987qab.6.1348053258616; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 04:14:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.91.47 with SMTP id cb15mr832047vdb.11.1348053258544; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 04:14:18 -0700 (PDT) Path: t12ni24360859qak.0!nntp.google.com!i6no7612qas.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 04:14:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <99575344-c301-4af2-9155-b6577bfb1ca6@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=195.58.145.51; posting-account=28F2IwkAAACL1Z5nRC-dE7zuvWdbWC7P NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.58.145.51 References: <99575344-c301-4af2-9155-b6577bfb1ca6@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Qt or Gtk? (from an Ada perspective) From: tonyg Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:14:18 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2012-09-19T04:14:18-07:00 List-Id: On Monday, 17 September 2012 12:34:41 UTC+1, (unknown) wrote: > Which of the two is better supported in Ada, Qt or Gtk? > > > > Also, which of the two is easier to use? (for a beginner) > > > > Note: what I actually need to use is a very small subset of the functionality offered by these toolkits, in that I will only use some basic GUI functions like text edit boxes, as well as file I/O and text processing. But not much beyond that. > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > Alby My Vote is for gtkada. Make sure you can use the GTKbuilder object so you can decouple layout design and coding.