From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d0c649cbc04d397b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed01.chello.at!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Weird problem with recursion and tasks
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: <1165116074.751484.99560@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <1165180207.340218.164360@16g2000cwy.googlegroups.com>
 <1165262947.193093.299400@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <1165318729.11036.9.camel@localhost>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 14:07:26 +0100
Message-ID: <c6krhi1wr6nr$.9e7chapvmtwt.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 05 Dec 2006 14:07:26 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 0e211003.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=hfb?dCl2N:X\9P[:DUn00QMcF=Q^Z^V3X4Fo<]lROoRQgUcjd<3m<;RA;PkK19L:T[[6LHn;2LCV^7enW;^6ZC`TF0oL<hNO29[;E?4R?aCeZU
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7811
Date: 2006-12-05T14:07:26+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 12:38:49 +0100, Georg Bauhaus wrote:

> On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 12:09 -0800, christopher.orihuela@gmail.com wrote:
>> well, if anybody ever has the same problem, someone else found a
>> workaround: using pointers to objects task declared at an equal or
>> higher level than the procedure that launches them.
> 
> Does this mean we shouldn't use Ada the way it was designed
> when using GNAT?

Was it a rhetorical question? I like to answer those! (:-)) Yes, we
shouldn't, because there is pretty little choice for people outside large
firms. Because even in a large firm you have first to convince management
to buy licenses. GNAT de facto is a monopolist on the market which isn't a
market at all...

So either you fix your program or you do the compiler. [Rhetorically] What
would you choose?

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de