From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,672cb5a7ed847988
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-22 04:57:29 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!feed.news.tiscali.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.hanau.net!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-ham1.dfn.de!news.uni-hamburg.de!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail
From: Georg Bauhaus <sb463ba@l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GCC 3.4 Ada compiler quality?
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:57:29 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: GMUGHDU
Message-ID: <c68bv9$qcu$2@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
References: <xTyhc.5424$e4.1321@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de
X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1082635049 27038 134.91.1.34 (22 Apr 2004
 11:57:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:57:29 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00
 (9000/800))
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7407
Date: 2004-04-22T11:57:29+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Brian Catlin <BrianC@sannas.org.bad> wrote:
: I know it was just released, but does anyone have a good feel for the quality of 
: the new GCC 3.4 Ada compiler?  Is it worth upgrading from 3.15P, or should I 
: wait until 3.5?

It has solved some problems for me having to do with private
children, and with generic formals in certain circumstances.

I find -gnatwa quite useful

The project file support is better (though this might affect
portabiliy).