From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.58.46.204 with SMTP id x12mr3811683vem.19.1390508363860;
        Thu, 23 Jan 2014 12:19:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.50.82.33 with SMTP id f1mr9849igy.0.1390508363539; Thu, 23
 Jan 2014 12:19:23 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!f11no1452016qae.1!news-out.google.com!vg8ni9igb.0!nntp.google.com!c10no2453431igq.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 12:19:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <82dd8f7f-478e-4f69-be05-4bacba32d968@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=199.46.200.231;
 posting-account=tXrPSAkAAAAFR3M1xqoK7TQdrNxOfPT0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.46.200.231
References: <fc442009-9a98-4527-9e45-fe5fd3cfadb4@googlegroups.com>
 <82dd8f7f-478e-4f69-be05-4bacba32d968@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c623c35b-fff3-4006-9485-6f1a6c297aa6@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Ada on Android and iOS?
From: Micronian Coder <micronian2@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:19:23 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 1982
X-Received-Body-CRC: 548827274
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:18270
Date: 2014-01-23T12:19:23-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Apple already relaxed the restrictions a few months later that same year:
http://arstechnica.com/apple/2010/09/apple-relaxes-restrictions-on-ios-app-=
code-iad-analytics/

On Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:20:27 AM UTC-8, Dan'l Miller wrote:
> http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/08/apples-iphone-lockdown-apps-must-be-wr=
itten-in-one-of-three-la
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Presumably to thwart app development in Adobe Flash (and to thwart Androi=
d & .NET apps on iOS), the article linked above says that nonHTML/nonJavaSc=
ript app development is legally restricted by Apple to be in only the progr=
amming languages {C, Objective C, C++, Objective C++}.  Does anyone know wh=
ether the iOS app developer agreement has been changed since 2010 to remove=
 this restriction?