From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1a0fd7f96069214f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-20 07:07:00 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: prenom_nomus@yahoo.com (Mark) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Documentation Standards Date: 20 Aug 2001 07:07:00 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: References: <3B7E64B2.AE1D4938@earthlink.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.46.200.231 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 998316420 27499 127.0.0.1 (20 Aug 2001 14:07:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Aug 2001 14:07:00 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12124 Date: 2001-08-20T14:07:00+00:00 List-Id: > > What appears to me be the next generation of the 2167A/498 evolution is > J-STD-016. If you're familiar with 2167, you'll get a warm fuzzy > looking through this. J-STD-016 is titled something like "Software Life > Cycle Processes", and is a joint IEEE/EIA standard. I got my copy via > my employer, which cost them somewhere in the vicinity of $200--I think, > for sure at least $100. It doesn't sound very new see: http://www.software.org/quagmire/descriptions/j-std-016.asp http://www.abelia.com/pubsmain.htm http://www.software.org/dcspin/Past_Mtgs1999.html#Aug99 Aren't most organizations just taking the 498/016 standard and tailoring it to meet their needs since the DoD no longer enforces this kind of standard?