From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: Suggestion about best practice with .gpr files
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 00:42:04 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5a4504a-d3dd-4809-97de-a08f01af2b08n@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s90s5l$b3d$1@dont-email.me>
Jeffrey R. Carter schrieb am Sonntag, 30. Mai 2021 um 22:22:16 UTC+2:
> The best practice is not to use project files.
That's a bit extreme. I remember that APEX and ObjAda both had their own ways to define their library structures for source and object files. And so has GNAT.
I don't think that there is a universal way.
> When everything is is Ada, they
> only add unnecessary and non-portable complexity. Unnecessary complexity is a
> sign of incompetence.
>
> The same is true of build directory structures.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-31 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-30 17:37 Suggestion about best practice with .gpr files mockturtle
2021-05-30 17:46 ` Stephen Leake
2021-05-30 19:31 ` Simon Wright
2021-05-30 17:56 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2021-05-30 20:22 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2021-05-31 7:42 ` AdaMagica [this message]
2021-05-31 16:59 ` Stephen Leake
2021-06-01 9:33 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2021-06-04 7:48 ` Björn Lundin
2021-06-04 8:14 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2021-06-04 9:18 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2021-06-04 9:47 ` Björn Lundin
2021-06-04 12:52 ` Simon Wright
2021-06-04 14:53 ` Björn Lundin
2021-06-01 14:38 ` Shark8
2021-05-31 15:02 ` Maxim Reznik
2021-05-31 17:07 ` Stephen Leake
2021-05-31 20:14 ` Per Sandberg
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox