From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9d303864ae4c70ad X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-10 13:50:59 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.telebyte.nl!newsfeed.stueberl.de!eusc.inter.net!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Reprise: 'in out' parameters for functions Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 20:50:58 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: <87brm1pksa.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <87lll4ydj9.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <87y8p45bpv.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1081630258 1139 134.91.1.34 (10 Apr 2004 20:50:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 20:50:58 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6956 Date: 2004-04-10T20:50:58+00:00 List-Id: Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: : The only reasonable use of an access parameter is to have "in out" : where it is not allowed. Access parameters go well with access discriminants...?