From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9d303864ae4c70ad X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-09 09:17:42 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed.stueberl.de!eusc.inter.net!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Reprise: 'in out' parameters for functions Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 16:17:42 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: <5ad0dd8a.0404090512.15af2908@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1081527462 5674 134.91.1.34 (9 Apr 2004 16:17:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 16:17:42 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6914 Date: 2004-04-09T16:17:42+00:00 List-Id: Wojtek Narczynski wrote: : Several warts. For example, abstraction inversion (just look at ACT : PolyOrb code, or try to implement tree crabbing), I take it Ada forces abstraction in version in cases? Could you name an example unit to look at? : type system unable : to express physical units, Still, you might have type Quantity is abstract tagged private; function in_meters (x: Quantity) return Units.meter; function in_yards (x: Quantity) return Units.yard; -- etc... : But the problem real problem IMO is that : the development of the language has stagnated. What's missing?