From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9d303864ae4c70ad X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-09 03:04:24 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed.stueberl.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!dialin-145-254-040-127.arcor-ip.NET!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Reprise: 'in out' parameters for functions Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:04:10 +0200 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <87brm1pksa.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: dialin-145-254-040-127.arcor-ip.net (145.254.40.127) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1081505062 92951262 I 145.254.40.127 ([77047]) User-Agent: KNode/0.7.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6887 Date: 2004-04-09T12:04:10+02:00 List-Id: Florian Weimer wrote: > Stephen Leake writes: > >> Ada has a wart. Let's admit it, and move on. > > Can't we fix that one without breaking backwards compatibility? procedure Has_A_Result (...) return Result; > Or are politics involved? I think so. But there also is the problem of evaluation order, though simply ignored for access parameters of functions. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov www.dmitry-kazakov.de