From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.98.212.91 with SMTP id u27mr1853425pfl.4.1485526018933;
        Fri, 27 Jan 2017 06:06:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.56.117 with SMTP id r50mr583525otd.12.1485526018871;
 Fri, 27 Jan 2017 06:06:58 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!r185no647048ita.0!news-out.google.com!78ni14005itm.0!nntp.google.com!r185no654373ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 06:06:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <fb3687c7-0a40-4f8e-abfc-0438a45d2374@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2a02:c7d:3cda:7600:932b:b705:6315:5a80;
 posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:c7d:3cda:7600:932b:b705:6315:5a80
References: <df643a73-3e84-4517-ba81-7bc50d0c0d54@googlegroups.com>
 <o6df5i$i1l$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <fb3687c7-0a40-4f8e-abfc-0438a45d2374@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c5210e77-2950-4a80-b1b3-e366d5fc3bd8@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Extend slices for n dimensional arrays for Ada 202X
From: Lucretia <laguest9000@googlemail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 14:06:58 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:33198
Date: 2017-01-27T06:06:58-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, 27 January 2017 01:54:53 UTC, Robert Eachus  wrote:

> Randy, I hope you are confused.  First, if you are copying one array to 

You think this is doable for small arrays where the CPU handles the copy, what about the massive arrays I'm talking about? Also the case of the custom copy routine where another, more custom, processor handles the copy?