From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c0f035b936128b6c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,c0f035b936128b6c X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public From: demer@hc17031.hcsd.ca (David Emery) Subject: Re: Ada95 to ANSI_C converter Date: 1997/03/31 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 229756797 Sender: demer@hc17031.hcsd.ca References: <5hbrah$ctt$1@gail.ripco.com> Organization: HCSD Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c Date: 1997-03-31T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: >This raises a few immediate questions. Do you mean ANSI C, or do you mean >ANSI C++ (as it evolves)? Note that C++ is entering ballot as both an ANSI and ISO standard. That means we should finally have a C++ standard by the end of the year, 2 1/2 years after the Ada95 standard! dave -- Note: if email to me bounces, use 'emery@grebyn.com'