From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,44b339a8f30d7ab7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-25 06:06:33 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!feed.news.tiscali.de!eusc.inter.net!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada compiler not installed on this system Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: <1102484.cgWYP6UCLW@linux1.krischik.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1080223592 13525 134.91.1.34 (25 Mar 2004 14:06:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:06:32 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6508 Date: 2004-03-25T14:06:32+00:00 List-Id: Martin Krischik wrote: : Zouplaz wrote: : :> 2) Is there a simple method to add ada support to gcc 3.3.3 (I presume :> that --enable-language=ada,c++ is not enough, that would be a dream) : : : ../gcc/configure \ : --prefix=/opt/ada \ : --enable-libada \ Is libada present in GCC 3.3.3 (which seems to be the OP's compiler)? : --enable-shared \ : --enable-threads=gnat \ Might mean no tasking outside Ada. : --enable-languages=ada,c,f77,c++ \ depending on other issues, this combination might or might not be supported, as configure says. If it works, good. : --target=${in_Config} ; : : make -j8 | tee ../compile.${in_Config}.log; Does the parallel make work for GCCC 3.3.3? If so, has there been an update to the documentation (which says otherwise)? "Currently, when compiling the Ada front end, you cannot use the parallel build feature described in the previous section."