From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,578bd4d051bc4686 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-19 07:14:43 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsrout1.ntli.net!news.ntli.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!eusc.inter.net!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: OT: GUI [was:]Ann: TeXCAD 4.1 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:14:42 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: <40577688.2A8B9832@fakeaddress.nil> NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1079709282 28086 134.91.1.34 (19 Mar 2004 15:14:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:14:42 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6446 Date: 2004-03-19T15:14:42+00:00 List-Id: Preben Randhol wrote: :> No, actually some people pay for software. : : If you pay 500-600 euro for a software that does not give you any : additional features Have you looked at the software you are talking about? : but only a slightly different GUI, then either 1) : you are not paying or 2) you have too much money or 3) you extemely (The essentials cost just about 80) : picky about unimportant details. (featuring normative ontology; slightly arrogant intended or not) This brings us the software that is not respecting the rule, "Know what the *users* of the system need/want." It isn't the *programmer* who decides what is an important detail to a graphics artist (in the case of a pictures editting program). If these details aren't part of the requirements specification what kind of users do you have in mind for your programs?