From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a24:a945:: with SMTP id x5mr990099iti.26.1549677245879;
        Fri, 08 Feb 2019 17:54:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:208:: with SMTP id l8mr4153oie.2.1549677245634;
 Fri, 08 Feb 2019 17:54:05 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!k10no351362itk.0!news-out.google.com!v141ni311ita.0!nntp.google.com!k10no351361itk.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 17:54:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <cJ36E.228820$Pa4.221682@fx30.am4>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=5.186.124.106;
 posting-account=hMbstgoAAAAIa4kxFYtvUVUHbE1RcZzT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 5.186.124.106
References: <83fdb793-f7b5-4b49-93df-2fe6c90bf334@googlegroups.com>
 <uO44E.225598$mz2.181452@fx23.am4>
 <f75ed8ec-bb72-4fef-b73f-256a8aafea29@googlegroups.com>
 <cJ36E.228820$Pa4.221682@fx30.am4>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c33f5799-541e-4326-a428-e03d808ef7e7@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Best documents on software architecture
From: Jesper Quorning <jesper.quorning@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 01:54:05 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55477
Date: 2019-02-08T17:54:05-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

tirsdag den 5. februar 2019 kl. 00.16.26 UTC+1 skrev Chris M Moore:
> On 31/01/2019 16:22, Jesper Quorning wrote:
> > tirsdag den 29. januar 2019 kl. 23.52.11 UTC+1 skrev Chris M Moore:
> 
> > What I mean by architecture is more like the art of making a program, not how to do some calculations and putting messages through queues and the like.
This I consider detailled design.

> Ah, program design.  I'm reading A Philosophy Of Software Design by John 
> Ousterhout at the moment.
Is this book worth reading in Your oppinion?
 
> > When you build a building you combine engineering for making sure it will function to do the job and an architect to make the building appealing to the customer and surroundings.
> 
> Or did you mean User Interface Design?  If so then you may have the 
> wrong group!
I guess architecture is top level design and user experience. The detailled design is the job of the engineer. So a good resouce on top level software design and user experience.

Greetings
/J