From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,13b7917466f2d19 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-05 01:39:28 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!212.177.105.133!news.mailgate.org!zur.uu.net!ash.uu.net!spool0900.news.uu.net!news0-alterdial.eu.uu.net!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT and GCC 3.0 Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 10:39:26 +0200 Message-ID: References: <9a575af3.0110020747.2304ce86@posting.google.com> <5ee5b646.0110041038.5c321817@posting.google.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.22.27.143 X-Trace: news0-alterdial.eu.uu.net 1002271166 1607 62.22.27.143 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13768 Date: 2001-10-05T10:39:26+02:00 List-Id: On 4 Oct 2001 11:38:27 -0700, dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) wrote: >The sources at gcc represent work in progress, and as I have >mentioned before, there are known problems. Who will act as commiters for the GCC GNAT sources? ACT people, I hope? I ask because although the GCC/GNAT integration is great, I fear that quality may suffer. >Don't expect a fully usable public version of GNAT from these sources >for a while, BTW, the GNAT.Sockets package (renamed to GNAT_Sockets) works very well with 3.13p. Great! /L/e/k/t/u