From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,735c710b5e547bad X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.66.72.73 with SMTP id b9mr324851pav.9.1343382266341; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 02:44:26 -0700 (PDT) Path: c10ni42415pbw.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: AdaMagica Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada 2005 puzzle Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 02:42:57 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <1arp60wtxes8h$.1qs6bt732ztgp.dlg@40tude.net> <030cde76-7435-405d-9f12-ac7f730ecab8@googlegroups.com> <1f9q6vk5z2r3t$.1hayo9rmxfwu7$.dlg@40tude.net> <1agfifqlayl3y.1bp09z5i37ewk$.dlg@40tude.net> <1nnq1oprn6h4f.1s5myl3oupdds$.dlg@40tude.net> <57ed1bca-b503-492c-a3b1-012369484e93@googlegroups.com> <1gt5njrqzprkt$.1f9deqqcwyyuq.dlg@40tude.net> <1g6eygs4wyie8.x1sl1gap1gec$.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.7.107.218 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1343382266 20765 127.0.0.1 (27 Jul 2012 09:44:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 09:44:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de In-Reply-To: <1g6eygs4wyie8.x1sl1gap1gec$.dlg@40tude.net> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=91.7.107.218; posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf User-Agent: G2/1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2012-07-27T02:42:57-07:00 List-Id: On Thursday, July 26, 2012 3:55:52 PM UTC+2, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >> >> Well, then, you need to tell the ARG that through the official route. > > No. As Randy said, without pressure from customers ARG would not move a > finger. This is why I rather make the case here. Dmitry, that's nonsense. You are too bull-headed (as Randy said) to understand that what you call customers here is real Ada users that ARG want input from about problems they encounter with the language standard. We are the customers here. So, zum Teufel noch mal, send it in... > It seems that people in c.l.a. are not aware that limited objects are > virtually impossible to create and that limited aggregates and functions > were apparently never intended to help this. The latter was a surprise even > to disillusioned me.