From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c124bae3e9a343bf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-20 11:22:13 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!feed.textport.net!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Ted Dennison Sender: usenet@www.newsranger.com References: Subject: Re: re: crosstalk article on ada Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 19:18:32 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1 X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com X-Trace: www.newsranger.com 985115912 127.0.0.1 (Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:18:32 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:18:32 EST Organization: http://www.newsranger.com Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:5918 Date: 2001-03-20T19:18:32+00:00 List-Id: In article , Riehle, Richard says... > >Before we become too excited by the excellent article written by Ben Brosgol >and published in Crosstalk, we need to watch for the rebuttal promised by >the >editor in the Editor's Notes. .. >Now. I am wondering who is writing the "opposing view" for the future issue >of Crosstalk. I thought this *was* the "opposing view", with the article in the previous issue being the original view. The previous article had a very similar blurb on it, so I figured this was just the same blurb (badly) reworded a smidge to indicate that this is the promised second article. Am I misreading things? --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com