From: Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid>
Subject: Re: Benchmark Ada, please
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 21:44:14 +0300
Date: 2014-07-05T21:44:14+03:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c1qvbvFcu7uU1@mid.individual.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c1qug1FcogaU1@mid.individual.net>
To Guillaume: an apology and retraction for some text of mine which, on
rereading, is aggressive for no reason:
On 14-07-05 21:29 , Niklas Holsti wrote:
> On 14-07-05 20:00 , Guillaume Foliard wrote:
>> Niklas Holsti wrote:
>>> What did the "time" command output in your tests?
>>
>> For the command it is given as argument, "time" reports the elapsed time
>> ("real time"), the CPU time spent in user mode ("user time") and the CPU
>> time spent in system mode ("sys time"). I just used it to double check the
>> CPU time values.
>
> I know well what "time" does; I asked you to show the values it produced
> so that we could see that they, too, show Ada to be faster. If you don't
> want to do that, that is your right, of course.
I apologize to Guillaume for that aggressive reply of mine. Obviously
Guillame misunderstood my question for "time" output; I had no cause to
become annoyed by that. Sorry, Guillaume.
--
Niklas Holsti
Tidorum Ltd
niklas holsti tidorum fi
. @ .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-05 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-04 17:23 Benchmark Ada, please Victor Porton
2014-07-05 12:34 ` Guillaume Foliard
2014-07-05 13:00 ` Niklas Holsti
2014-07-05 17:00 ` Guillaume Foliard
2014-07-05 18:29 ` Niklas Holsti
2014-07-05 18:44 ` Niklas Holsti [this message]
2014-07-05 18:50 ` Guillaume Foliard
2014-07-05 19:09 ` Niklas Holsti
2014-07-05 16:33 ` Simon Wright
2014-07-05 18:25 ` Guillaume Foliard
2014-07-06 17:24 ` Dirk Heinrichs
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox