From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.36.19.2 with SMTP id 2mr1861455itz.4.1516716333911;
        Tue, 23 Jan 2018 06:05:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.1.22 with SMTP id 22mr510434otu.0.1516716333766; Tue, 23
 Jan 2018 06:05:33 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.unit0.net!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!g80no2386104itg.0!news-out.google.com!s63ni3375itb.0!nntp.google.com!g80no2386103itg.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 06:05:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <lymv1719vh.fsf@pushface.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=85.243.127.244;
 posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.243.127.244
References: <193126c2-f171-43ed-8c7c-00570f1dd4d4@googlegroups.com>
 <lymv1719vh.fsf@pushface.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c1eb33cd-4831-424d-9c39-e6cbc1a327ad@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: making a son benefit access ton an instanciation of a generic
 package required as a formal parameter to his father and instanciated by him
From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:05:33 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2212
X-Received-Body-CRC: 954541025
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50071
Date: 2018-01-23T06:05:33-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I really have a hard time with technical terms. To sum up my understanding (excluding use of limited_with), a picture is worth a thousand words. Is that ok ?

with Generic_package_P0; 
with normal_package;
private with private_only;

generic
	with package P1 is new P1_G;
package P2_G is
	package P0 is new Generic_package_P0;[...];
private
	package P0_v2 is new Generic_package_P0; -- private_only visible
end P2_G;

generic
package P2_G.Child is
	-- Generic_package_P0, normal_package, P0 visible
	-- can also instanciate Generic_package_P0, whose instance will be visible below in private and body part. 
private
	-- the same, P0_V2 is also visible P0_v2 and private_only
end P2_G.Child;
package body P2_G.Child
	-- same for instanciating any generic.
	-- exact same than above in private part, plus things declared here and hidden from above as well as for later children.
end body P2_G.Child;