From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a24:d643:: with SMTP id
 o64-v6mr6329206itg.48.1527941659305;
        Sat, 02 Jun 2018 05:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:276e:: with SMTP id
 r101-v6mr132478ota.9.1527941659107;
 Sat, 02 Jun 2018 05:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!85.12.16.69.MISMATCH!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!v8-v6no3061530itc.0!news-out.google.com!b185-v6ni3389itb.0!nntp.google.com!u74-v6no3072119itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2018 05:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <petjh7$2lq$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=85.245.163.26;
 posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.245.163.26
References: <5e86db65-84b9-4b5b-9aea-427a658b5ae7@googlegroups.com>
 <petjh7$2lq$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c124dac4-31dc-4932-b916-9a6b7e15de4c@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Ada Successor Language
From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2018 12:14:19 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1542
X-Received-Body-CRC: 32676184
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52850
Date: 2018-06-02T05:14:18-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> I don't understand this push for a new language.
Haven't you complained already how such or such area is unlikely to even be fixed because of backward compatibility ?
> We should adopt the common C shorthand operators, -=, +=, etc.
What's the problem with @ ? It's more elegant and versatile.