From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a9f89faeb8f41ad0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: haug@localhost.ruhr.de (Haug Buerger)
Subject: Re: ifdef replacement for GNAT
Date: 1998/04/12
Message-ID: <c1.01.2L2phn$022@zesi.ruhr.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 343526140
Sender: haug@zesi.ruhr.de
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <352287EE.1CFB@tolstoy.mdc.com> <352B8208.41C6@tolstoy.mdc.com>
 <dewar.892128219@merv> <86g1jm2gcf.fsf@zappa>
 <6gmgmf$9di$1@gonzo.sun3.iaf.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: haug@zesi.ruhr.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-04-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Geert Bosch <geert@gonzo.sun3.iaf.nl> wrote:
...
>Very easy: put system dependent stuff in a package with a well defined
>interface (spec) and use different bodies for different systems.
>You'd like to make this system dependent part as small as possible,
>but this is a good design principle anyway.

Can i use gnatmake with this approach? If yes how?

Haug

--

For email use haug@zesi.ruhr.de !