From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ef7281a41a574423,start
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin1!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.tu-darmstadt.de!news.belwue.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Task execution time test
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 11:25:21 +0100
Message-ID: <c0x1bxkh3iba.1wxmlynt1dx62$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Dec 2010 11:25:20 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 0016a0b3.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=ggm=3T[E4_6QbA1[CgMQ00A9EHlD;3Yc24Fo<]lROoR18kF<OcfhCO;118jo\61Qn8[6LHn;2LCV>[<mhadbfdU;GDKDm`h>HY5^EOVk<UdU5?
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:17112
Date: 2010-12-26T11:25:20+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Here is a small test for task execution time.

Five worker tasks are used to generate background CPU load. When the
measured task enters delay 0.1ms (on a system where delay is non-busy) it
should lose the CPU prematurely.

Under at least some Windows systems the test might fail because Windows
performance counters are CPU quants 1ms or 10ms, depending on settings.

Under VxWorks the test may fail because real-time clock there is driven by
the timer interrupts, so it is impossible to have non-busy wait for 0.1ms.

(I cannot say anything about Linux, because I never used it for RT
applications, maybe other people could comment)

----------------------------------------------------
with Ada.Execution_Time;  use Ada.Execution_Time;
with Ada.Real_Time;       use Ada.Real_Time;
with Ada.Text_IO;         use Ada.Text_IO;

with Ada.Numerics.Elementary_Functions;

procedure Executuion_Time is
   task type Measured;
   task body Measured is
      Count    : Seconds_Count;
      Fraction : Time_Span;
   begin
      for I in 1..1_000 loop
         delay 0.000_1;
      end loop;
      Split (Ada.Execution_Time.Clock, Count, Fraction);
      Put_Line
      (  "Seconds" & Seconds_Count'Image (Count) &
         " Fraction" & Duration'Image (To_Duration (Fraction))
      );
   end Measured;

   task type Worker; -- Used to generate CPU load
   task body Worker is
      use Ada.Numerics.Elementary_Functions;
      X : Float;
   begin
      for I in Positive'Range loop
         X := sin (Float (I));
      end loop;
   end Worker;
   
begin
   delay 0.1; -- This might be needed for some buggy versions of GNAT
   declare
      Workers : array (1..5) of Worker;
      Test    : Measured;
   begin
      null;
   end;
end Executuion_Time;
-----------------------------------------------------
On my Windows XP SP3 the test yields 0-0.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de