From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,195bd8ec4227e968 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-12 12:44:28 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-ham1.dfn.de!news.uni-hamburg.de!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [Q] non-limited record and "self-pointer" Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 20:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: <86d68pl0tc.fsf@sonnenregen.at.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1076618668 7645 134.91.1.34 (12 Feb 2004 20:44:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 20:44:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5499 Date: 2004-02-12T20:44:28+00:00 List-Id: Robert I. Eachus wrote: : : In this case, there is an implementation freedom with Controlled that is : totally bogus. I guess then that I should not define a type and operations so that they work if an implementation chooses to let this work. That means I might have to revert to limited types, with all the consequences... -- Georg